Defending against fraudulent enlistment charges.
Military service is an important step in many people's lives. It can provide a sense of belonging and connection to a larger community, as well as training and opportunities for personal growth. But, just to get some short-term gain that they may generally be unqualified for, some people take a shortcut - they conceal some required information, exaggerate, or outright lie. These are known as "fraudulent enlistments."
Fraudulent enlistments happen when someone joins the military with the intent to commit a crime or deceive the military in some way. This could include lying about qualifications, age, or criminal history. Fraudulent enlistments are against the Uniform Code of Military Justice. They can result in penalties, so it is critical to work with a military defense lawyer should you face such charges.
Generally, these penalties can include a range of fines, imprisonment, and/or dishonorable discharge from the military. Some of the more specific penalties that may apply in a particular case depend on the nature and severity of the false statement, whether the individual successfully enlisted/got promoted/got a discharge under pretenses, and whether any harm was caused.
Learn the Elements of Article 83 Before Enrolling in Anything
Military members looking to enroll in a new program or considering separation from the military should be aware of Article 83 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). This article covers fraudulent enlistment, appointment, or separation. The punishment for those found guilty of this offense can range from a dishonorable discharge to imprisonment.
Individuals should know several key elements of Article 83 before deciding about their military service. First, it is crucial to understand what constitutes fraudulent enlistment, appointment, or separation. Fraudulent conduct can include lying about qualifications or providing false information to obtain entry into the military or advancement within the ranks. It can also involve concealing criminal history or other information that could impact service eligibility.
Another element of Article 83 pertains to the consequences of committing fraud.
Can Article 83 Be Defended Against?
A few defenses are available to those accused of fraudulent enlistment, appointment, or separation.
The first is a mistake of fact. This defense argues that the accused did not intentionally misrepresent themselves to the military but made an honest mistake about their qualifications or eligibility.
The second defense is consent. This defense argues that the accused did not deliberately misrepresent themselves but willingly agreed to enlist in the military in dire need out of a willingness to serve their country.
A third defense is a justifiable reliance on false information. This defense argues that the accused relied on false information from someone other than themselves and were not at fault for not verifying such information.
Yet another defense is duress. This defense argues that the accused was forced into joining the military against their will and did not have a choice in the matter.
The fifth defense is a lack of mental capacity. This defense argues that the accused lacked the mental capacity to understand their actions when they joined the military.
Finally, the sixth defense is the statute of limitations.
Speak to a Military Defense Attorney
Military enlistment fraud can result in various penalties, depending on the severity of the offense and the particular military branch involved. In the most serious cases, a service member could be dishonorably discharged from the military, which would mean losing all benefits and privileges associated with military service. A less severe penalty might be a reduction in rank, being required to forfeit pay, or receiving a jail sentence.
As such, if you are accused of military enlistment fraud, it is crucial to speak with a military defense attorney at Griffin Law Defense, who can help protect your rights and defend you against the charges.